Reef Aquarium Carbon Dosing Clarified

The key to success with coral such as Goniopora may be healthy populations of bacteria

The key to success with coral such as Goniopora may be healthy populations of bacteria

Carbon dosing is a relatively new phenomenon in the reef aquarium hobby. The first I heard about it was around two years ago, and I hadn’t given it a whole lot of thought until recently. The goal of carbon dosing is to improve water quality by lowering nitrates and phosphates. Nitrates and phosphates can lead to algae blooms and poor coral health if the levels are too high. Some aquarists have difficulty controlling these levels and it can be a frustrating battle.

Carbon dosing lowers these two chemical parameters by providing a food source for bacteria that consume nitrates and phosphates. Then, by removing the bacteria through protein skimming, the aquarist eliminates nitrates and phosphates from the water. It is similar in concept to algae scrubbing, whereby one grows algae to bind up phosphate, nitrate, and heavy metals, and then exports them from the system by periodically harvesting the algae. In a carbon-dosing system, bacteria are removed instead of algae.

For the longest time, I paid little attention to carbon dosing because I did not have detectable quantities of either phosphates or nitrates. This is not so much a boast as it is the reality of having a 1,000-gallon system with very few fish in it. There just aren’t a lot of ways for nitrates and phosphates to build up. Why attempt to fix a non-problem, after all? Having said that, there could be some benefits to carbon dosing even though the system already has low nitrates and phosphates.

Extra feeding capacity

The first advantage to carbon dosing is it allows the reefkeeper to feed much more heavily. I am of the firm belief that most of our tanks are underfed and both the fish and invertebrates would fare better if fed more frequently (and in higher quantities). The limitation is the filtration capacity of the system. If the filtering capacity of your system is exceeded, heavy feeding can cause a buildup of nutrients that will lead to poor water quality. Bolstering the filtration capacity of your reef through carbon dosing allows you to feed that much more into the system.

Bacterial nutrition

The second benefit is that the bacteria themselves contribute to invertebrate nutrition. If you have ever heard of the term “reef snow,” it is in reference to bacteria colonies growing on particulates that provide nutrition to countless marine organisms. I’ve recently learned that bacteria might comprise far more nutrition than originally thought. In fact, bacteria alone could provide ALL the nutritional requirements of coral. Not only do bacteria provide nitrogen and carbon for the coral, but they also provide phosphorous and trace elements for the corals’ zooxanthellae.

Many of my coral videos focus on feeding corals, and some corals, such as Goniopora, are notoriously difficult to feed. For these finicky eaters, the key may be to focus less on trying to feed seafood products and more on providing healthy populations of bacteria as a food source.

Ultra-low-nutrient voodoo

It’s somewhat questionable whether the third benefit is actually, well, beneficial. Carbon dosing can provide an ultra-low-nutrient environment. In ultra-low-nutrient systems, corals, especially SPS corals such as Acropora, Montipora, Pocillopora, Porites, etc., can take on exaggerated coloration. Some corals get insanely bright.

It is unclear at this time whether this is a healthy sign or not. Many times, the coral specimens that we think are the most aesthetically pleasing are actually the least healthy. Case in point: some of the most incredible Euphyllia I have ever seen were bleached colonies that had a ghostly translucent appearance. Once restored to health, they regained their brownish-green hue.

Carbon dosing downsides

Unfortunately, there are downsides to carbon dosing. Some aquarists run into issues with unsightly forms of bacteria proliferating. Chief among these are brown diatoms and red slime algae, which is a type of cyanobacteria.

For now, I intend to experiment with carbon dosing in the form of vodka dosing. There are other methods, such as vinegar, sugar, biopellets, and manufactured carbon products from a number of vendors.

Photo credit: Than Thein

Related posts:

SUBSCRIBE TO THE “SALT SMART” NEWSLETTER

If you enjoyed this post, subscribe to get our new posts in your email.
About Than Thein

Than Thein is the owner of Tidal Gardens and Advanced Reef Aquarium. Than's love for all things underwater began early on when dogs and cats were strictly off limits, but a fish tank? Sure! What started with a 10-gallon goldfish tank eventually turned into a 5,000-gallon greenhouse coral propagation system. In addition to coral aquaculture, Than's other hobbies include scuba diving and underwater photography and videography.

Comments

  1. I was unaware the carbon pellets or bio Chem.zorb in use causes diatoms. This really true?

    • I use carbon pellets in my HOB filter 10 gallon and I have no diatoms or any other algae breakouts, except the good kinds…of course, everybody’s tanks are different

    • Chris Aldrich says:

      Hi Brian – I spoke with Than and he mentioned he has not used Bio-Chem Zorb (nor have I), so he can’t speak to that product.

      As he mentioned, though, some aquarists do encounter increased unsightly bacteria while carbon dosing. So without knowing specifically, it certainly seems feasible.

  2. I carbon dose and run an algae turf scrubber and deep sand bed in my system, with an ‘Eco’ sump with lots of media, rock, sand, and macro algae. No skimmer, no mechanical filtration, just activated carbon and a little rowa phos sometimes. I have close to zero nuisance algae and close to zero nutrient measurements though I feed everything as much as it can consume – corals get fed every night when I can stay awake to do so – i love fattening them up! Only been running for 6 months, but I have several goniopora. All are doing well – although I know ‘success is measured in years not months’. That being said, given my first goniopora (Fluoro green – apparently rather hard to keep, even for a a Goni) has doubled in size (as per both surface area encrusted and total dimensions) I take this as an encouraging sign that the approach mentioned here does indeed suit goniopora. This particular one seemed impossible to spot feed (I don’t bother trying anymore seeing as it’s obviously getting what it needs – most likely bacteria and other micro plankton I suppose) from the water column – all the ‘snow’ that is in my tank.

Speak Your Mind

*